:

LECTURER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS YEAR 2024

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. Leadership firmness in implementing the HR management system 147 44 10 1 202 3.67 Very Good
2. Lecturer recruitment system implemented by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics 144 42 12 4 202 3.61 Very Good
3. Lecturer selection system implemented at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics 127 55 18 2 202 3.52 Very Good
4. Lecturer placement at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics 132 56 12 2 202 3.57 Very Good
Average 3.59 Very Good

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Layanan Pengembangan Kompetensi


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. The Faculty of Science and Mathematics facilitates needs for further study 135 53 14 0 202 3.6 Very Good
2. Support for self-development to attend courses/trainings 133 53 15 1 202 3.57 Very Good
3. Support for self-development to attend seminars/workshops 133 51 14 4 202 3.55 Very Good
4. Support and opportunities to participate in domestic benchmarking visits 144 47 8 3 202 3.64 Very Good
5. Support and opportunities to participate in international benchmarking visits 149 40 11 2 202 3.66 Very Good
Average 3.6 Very Good

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Layanan Pengembangan Karir/Jabatan


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. Access to information about career paths 137 53 11 1 202 3.61 Very Good
2. Services provided by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics regarding career paths 144 45 11 2 202 3.64 Very Good
3. Support and opportunities to advance career level 141 46 12 3 202 3.61 Very Good
4. Access to information about positions 138 49 12 3 202 3.59 Very Good
5. Services provided by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics regarding positions 151 42 8 1 202 3.7 Very Good
6. Support and opportunities for structural position promotion 138 49 13 2 202 3.6 Very Good
7. Support and opportunities for non-structural position promotion 145 43 11 3 202 3.63 Very Good
Average 3.63 Very Good

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Layanan Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. Facilities to obtain information about research activities 136 46 13 7 202 3.54 Very Good
2. FFacilities to obtain services for conducting research activities 139 52 8 3 202 3.62 Very Good
3. Availability of facilities and infrastructure supporting research activities 143 47 8 4 202 3.63 Very Good
4. Research proposal assessment by reviewers 137 53 11 1 202 3.61 Very Good
5. Equitable distribution of research based on lecturer distribution 137 46 15 4 202 3.56 Very Good
6. Equitable distribution of research based on lecturer qualifications 148 40 13 1 202 3.66 Very Good
7. Guidance facilities for preparing research proposals and final reports 144 47 7 4 202 3.64 Very Good
8. Opportunity to become a research reviewer 155 32 14 1 202 3.69 Very Good
9. Availability of information on accredited journals as a medium for publishing scientific work 140 48 13 1 202 3.62 Very Good
Average 3.62 Very Good

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Layanan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. Facilities to obtain information about community service (PkM) activities 133 46 18 5 202 3.52 Very Good
2. Facilities to obtain services for conducting community service (PkM) activities 144 48 6 4 202 3.64 Very Good
3. Availability of facilities and infrastructure supporting community service (PkM) activities 141 43 17 1 202 3.6 Very Good
4. Community service (PkM) proposal assessment by reviewers 148 46 8 0 202 3.69 Very Good
5. Equitable distribution of community service (PkM) based on lecturer distribution 137 51 13 1 202 3.6 Very Good
6. Equitable distribution of community service (PkM) based on lecturer qualifications 153 36 10 3 202 3.68 Very Good
7. Guidance facilities for preparing community service (PkM) proposals and final reports 139 51 10 2 202 3.62 Very Good
Average 3.62 Very Good

Survei Kepuasan Dosen Terhadap Layanan Keuangan, Sarana dan Prasarana


No. Statement Survey Result Number of Respondents Average Criteria
Very Good Good Fair Poor
1. Perencanaan anggaran keuangan disusun berdasar RKAT sesuai program renstra dan renop 136 56 9 1 202 3.62 Very Good
2. Involvement in preparing RKAT 137 55 8 2 202 3.62 Very Good
3. Alokasi anggaran sesuai perencanaan keuangan untuk kegiatan tridharma perguruan tinggi 151 37 12 2 202 3.67 Very Good
4. Realisasi anggaran program kerja prodi untuk kegiatan tridharma perguruan tinggi 139 47 11 5 202 3.58 Very Good
5. Budget use is accounted for transparently 130 50 21 1 202 3.53 Very Good
6. Information on fund usage and reporting is carried out transparently 138 49 14 1 202 3.6 Very Good
7. Availability of educational facilities and infrastructure 131 52 15 4 202 3.53 Very Good
8. Availability of research facilities and infrastructure 145 45 8 4 202 3.64 Very Good
9. Availability of community service (PkM) facilities and infrastructure 143 45 10 4 202 3.62 Very Good
10. Tersedianya fasilitas untuk mendukung luaran dosen dalam bentuk Jurnal dan Proseding 129 55 15 3 202 3.53 Very Good
Average 3.59 Very Good