LECTURER SATISFACTION SURVEY FORM

Please log in before filling out the survey

Lecturer Name	:
NIP	:

Satisfaction Survey Related to Human Resource Management

	Leadership firmness in implementing the HR management system
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Lecturer recruitment system implemented by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Lecturer selection system implemented at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Lecturer placement at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Satisfaction Survey Related to Competency Development Services

	The Faculty of Science and Mathematics facilitates needs for further study
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support for self-development to attend courses/trainings
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support for self-development to attend seminars/workshops
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support and opportunities to participate in domestic benchmarking visits
	Very Good	Good	Poor	Fair
	Support and opportunities to participate in international benchmarking visits
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Satisfaction Survey Related to Career/Position Development Services

	Access to information about career paths
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Services provided by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics regarding career paths
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support and opportunities to advance career level
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Access to information about positions
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Services provided by the Faculty of Science and Mathematics regarding positions
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support and opportunities for structural position promotion
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Support and opportunities for non-structural position promotion
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Satisfaction Survey Related to Research and Scientific Work Services

	Facilities to obtain information about research activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Facilities to obtain services for conducting research activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of facilities and infrastructure supporting research activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Research proposal assessment by reviewers
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Equitable distribution of research based on lecturer distribution
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Equitable distribution of research based on lecturer qualifications
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Guidance facilities for preparing research proposals and final reports
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Opportunity to become a research reviewer
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of information on accredited journals as a medium for publishing scientific work
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Satisfaction Survey Related to Community Service (PkM) Services

	Facilities to obtain information about community service (PkM) activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Facilities to obtain services for conducting community service (PkM) activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of facilities and infrastructure supporting community service (PkM) activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Community service (PkM) proposal assessment by reviewers
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Equitable distribution of community service (PkM) based on lecturer distribution
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Equitable distribution of community service (PkM) based on lecturer qualifications
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Guidance facilities for preparing community service (PkM) proposals and final reports
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Satisfaction Survey Related to Financial Services, Facilities, and Infrastructure

	Financial budget planning is prepared based on RKAT in accordance with strategic and operational plans
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Involvement in preparing RKAT
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Budget allocation aligned with financial planning for higher education tri-dharma activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Budget realization with study program or university work programs for higher education tri-dharma activities
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Budget use is accounted for transparently
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Information on fund usage and reporting is carried out transparently
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of educational facilities and infrastructure
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of research facilities and infrastructure
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of community service (PkM) facilities and infrastructure
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
	Availability of facilities to support lecturer outputs in the form of journals and proceedings
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor

Save